WebKnowles v Liverpool City Council extended meaning of “equipment” to materials used at work 8 Q The Occupiers’ Liability Acts 1957. A The Occupiers Liability Act 1957 places a duty of care on an occupier of a premises towards a lawfu l visitor to those premises. WebSep 21, 2024 · Knowles v Liverpool City Council: CA 2 Jul 1992. A flagstone handled by an employee was equipment for purposes of the Act. Gazette 26-Aug-1992, 90 LGR 595, (1992) 136 SJLB 220, [1993] ICR 21, [1993] IRLR 6, (1993) LG Rev 424, Times 02-Jul-1992. Employers Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1969 1. England and Wales.
Knowles v Liverpool County Council (1993) - Vocational Training
WebKNOWLES v LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL (APPELLANTS) [1993] IRLR 588 The House of Lords had to consider whether a flagstone was ‘equipment’ within the scope of the … WebMay 3, 1994 · The board was held liable, albeit that the plaintiff was found to be two-thirds to blame.In Knowles v Liverpool City Council [1993] 4 All ER 321, the House of Lords held that s.1 (1) of the... geralt fights the striga clips
High Court Judgment Template - Civil Litigation Brief
WebSep 21, 2024 · Next Knowles v Liverpool City Council: CA 2 Jul 1992 Areas of Law: Administrative (1,121) Adoption (461) Agency (619) Agriculture (773) Animals (305) Arbitration (1,259) Armed Forces (359) Banking (1,415) Benefits (3,477) Capital Gains Tax (486) Charity (383) Child Support (309) Children (5,384) Civil Procedure Rules (87) … WebOct 14, 1993 · Knowles (Respondent) and Liverpool City Council (Appellants) Lord Keith of Kinkel My Lords, 1 For the reasons given in the speech to be delivered by my noble and learned friend Lord Jauncey of Tullichettle, which I have read in draft and with which I agree, I would dismiss this appeal. Lord Templeman My Lords, 2 WebJul 10, 2024 · Knowles v Liverpool City Council (1993) K was injured at work when he handled a flagstone which broke. He claimed compensation from his employers. ... christina hitchcock tacoma